Incrementic

Critique My Flyer

An agent skill from Incrementic

Critique
my flyer

Three seconds. Then it's on the floor.

Paste a flyer, poster or event graphic into an AI agent and get back what it actually communicated in those three seconds, plus a ranked list of what to fix, hardest problem first.

Take a tab —

That's the squint test. Everything greyed out is what your flyer is competing with. Here's the rest of the read.

Inspection procedure

Four reads, in this order

Performed before any judgment. It's what stops a critique from being a rubric recited at you.

  1. The three-second read

    Look once, then write down, before analysing anything, what actually landed. If the headline, the what, and the what-do-I-do-next aren't all in that list, that's the finding, and it outranks everything else.

  2. The squint test

    Blur it. What still reads as a shape? Strong flyers survive: one dominant block, one image, one bright element. If everything greys into an even field, there's no hierarchy.

  3. The distance test

    Judged against where it'll actually be seen. At poster distance, body text under roughly 24 pt is decoration, not information. On a feed, it gets seen at thumbnail size first, so the headline has to survive at about 15% scale.

  4. The missing-information check

    Flyers fail more often from omission than from ugliness. A named list gets walked, every time.

    • what it is
    • date
    • start time
    • end time
    • venue name
    • address
    • price or “free”
    • who it's for
    • how to book
    • contact
    • accessibility
    • parking
    • rain date
    • age limits
    • who's running it

A flyer can only be judged against its job. The same design that fails as a handbill succeeds as an Instagram post, so it asks where this will be seen before it tells you anything.

What comes back

Ranked by consequence, not completeness. Three real problems in order beat eleven observations.

Illustrative example — not a real client flyer

COMMUNITY EVENT

Join us for a morning of community spirit on Saturday 14th at 10am, meeting by the car park at the north end of the beach, and please do bring your own gloves as we have a limited supply available on the day.

www.greenfieldcommunitytrust.org.uk

critique.md

Verdict

The photograph is doing real work and nothing else is. A stranger walking past learns that an organisation exists and that community is involved — not what's happening, or when.

What I got in three seconds

A beach, an organisation logo, and the words “community event”. Not what the event is, not when, not where.

Fix first

  • The headline says nothing — “COMMUNITY EVENT” is a category, not an invitation. Replace it with the thing itself: “BEACH CLEAN-UP” at the same size or larger, neighbourhood name under it.
  • The date and location are buried in prose — nobody scanning a noticeboard parses a 42-word paragraph. Pull date, start time and meeting point out as three stacked lines at roughly 24–28 pt, directly under the headline.
  • No call to action — it never says what to do. One line at the bottom: “Just turn up — or register at [URL]”, 14 pt minimum, QR code beside it.

Worth fixing

  • The photograph says nothing specific — a stock beach could illustrate a hundred different events, so it fills the top third without narrowing anything down. Keep it only once the headline names the event; better still, crop to people actually clearing a beach.
  • The logo is the largest element — it outranks the date, which is the second most important thing on the page. Drop it to a footer lockup, roughly a quarter of its current width.

What's working

The photograph is well cropped and the horizon sits off-centre, so the eye travels down into the layout rather than off the edge. Keep it — it's the only element earning its space.

Missing information

End time · whether children can come · accessibility of the meeting point · what happens if it rains

“Is that readable?” has a number

Minimums by viewing distance, from the skill's production reference. A floor, not a target. Thin weights, light-on-dark and low contrast all push them up.

Sometimes it isn't the flyer

A flyer is where a weak logo gets exposed: reproduced small, printed in one colour, reversed over a photograph. If the mark turns to mush at the size used here, or needs a white box behind it to survive the background, the problem will follow you onto every sign, poster and social post after this one.

When that's what's happening, the critique says so and hands you off rather than trying to fix a logo inside a flyer review.

Run the PPP Logo Test →

Go and run one

No install

Paste the prompt

Works in Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or anything else that reads an image. Copy it, paste it, then attach your flyer.

Download .md

Agent skill

Install it properly

Installs critique-my-flyer for Cursor, Claude Code and other supported agents so it triggers on its own.

npx skills add incrhst/ppp-logo-adviser@critique-my-flyer -y